wonder why the town council in its manifesto on school is not limited to stating their actions but must be due and payable at any cost that has no merit.
I recall that three parents of the football school (including myself) have not brought their children to school Mazzano, with the school offered free by the city of Calcata, as did everyone else, but the school Faleria, bringing to 13 the number of the first pupils and thereby exceed the threshold of the fateful 11. I do not see that has to do with the town council that steals Faleria the risk of gradual closure ": the usual stupid dates from the usual bias.
E 'review suggests that the canteen is a logical consequence of the time, and that it was now to be set up after years of fruitless promises? E 'review also found that the presence of personnel entry and exit of the school and on school buses were obtained respectively with a petition and determined struggles of the minority council?
Then, if it is true that there would be (the conditional is a must view the reliability of the statements of this administration) of 50-70 square meters of new classrooms ready for kindergarten can not understand why they did not start directly in the primary quest 'last, without the stress of the move in mid-October and the dangers present in classrooms rather battered (in my son's class there is a socket closed with tape ...).
Finally, the pride parade and for the service for disabled students is the most miserable there is in this manifesto. Service rather than due legal and human would not even remotely exploited.
Shareable and just the remark about the anonymous "Forum for Faleria.
These are sincere truth: let them partisan opportunism and information to others.
Armando Marchesini
0 comments:
Post a Comment